An unmarried couple approaches a property manager about the rental of an apartment. The property manager has previously been instructed by the landlord to only rent to a married couple. The unmarried couple meets all other qualifications set by the landlord to rent the property based upon income and credit history. Can the landlord legally discriminate against the prospective tenants because they are not married? As is so often the answer “it depends.”
Federal Fair Housing Laws prohibit housing discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap, or familial status. Marital status is not identified as a protected class. Further, marital status is not included within the federal definition of familial status.
Familial status is defined as having one or more individuals under 18 years of age who reside with a parent or with another person with care and legal custody of that individual or with a designee of that parent or other person with legal custody.
While there are some states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, and Oregon) that include marital status as a protected class in its housing discrimination laws, marital status is not enumerated as a protected class under Pennsylvania’s Human Relations Act. Again, protection against discrimination for the unmarried couple cannot be found under the term “familial status.” Pennsylvania defines familial status as dealing with families with children under the age of 18.
Having eliminated federal law and Pennsylvania law, it would seem that the answer is clear. Landlords in Pennsylvania can discriminate based upon marital status. Not so fast. As I mentioned earlier, it depends. In Pennsylvania, the answer may depend upon where in the Commonwealth that the alleged discrimination against the unmarried couple occurred.
Local municipalities can provide greater protection under its anti-discrimination ordinances than that provided by federal and state law. Many local municipalities in Pennsylvania have adopted fair housing/anti-discrimination ordinances. In some cases, marital status is specified as a protected class. For example, Philadelphia’s “Fair Practices Ordinance” provides protection against discrimination based upon marital status. Also, keep in mind that many local ordinances prohibit against discrimination based upon sexual orientation. The unmarried couple may fall in this category.
Property managers should educate themselves on the local fair housing ordinances of the municipalities where they practice. In some areas of the Commonwealth, marital status may be a protected class. In those areas, a landlord’s instruction to rent to only married couple contravenes the law.
Topics
Member Discussion
Recent Articles
-
Pennsylvania Sees More Homes on the Market
- May 21, 2025
- 2 min. read
Listings were up 3.5% in April over March, and up 7% compared to the same time last year, according to a report prepared for the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors®.
-
Insurance Topics Highlighted During PAR Meetings
- May 20, 2025
- 4 min. read
The National Flood Insurance Program must be extended before Sept. 30, and NAR supports long-term reauthorization and reform. The NFIP has been extended 33 times since September 2017.
-
Pa. Primary Election: Vote Tomorrow!
- May 19, 2025
- 1 min. read
As Realtors®, one of the best ways to make change is by voting for Realtor®-friendly candidates that help us advocate for our businesses, our industry and the communities we serve.
Daily Emails
You’ll be the first to know about real estate trends and various legal happenings. Stay up-to-date by subscribing to JustListed.